To explore this fascinating issue (fascinating by virtue of the fact that no actual football is being played right now,) I looked at how the Rivals ranking of recruiting classes compared over a period of time (2002-2008.) Why did I choose that time span? Because that was the time span I could easily access the data for Rivals, which ranked all 119 Division 1A schools.
I then took each team's win loss record as a percentage, and ranked that.
Then I did a simple calculation, comparing the Rivals Rank to that of the Win Percentage Rank, by dividing the former by the latter. I originally dubbed this a rank ratio, but someone with higher math skills than mine suggested that a ratio is like 1:2 and that this is an "index." So be it. The Rank Index was born. A team that is ranked close to or at it's recruiting rank would have an index of 1 or close to it. The higher the number, the better a team/coach out performs it's recruiting rank. The lower the number, the more talent is being squandered, and/or the more a team's recruiting rank was over-rated.
Here are the results:
Team | Win-Loss % | PCT Rank | Rivals Rank | Rank Index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Boise State | 87.90 | 2 | 76 | 38.00 |
2 | TCU | 76.55 | 8 | 64 | 8.00 |
3 | Utah | 73.98 | 11 | 59 | 5.36 |
4 | West Virginia | 75.37 | 9 | 40 | 4.44 |
5 | Hawaii | 65.69 | 22 | 85 | 3.86 |
6 | Bowling Green | 61.14 | 30 | 106 | 3.53 |
7 | Navy | 60.07 | 35 | 119 | 3.40 |
8 | Boston College | 71.51 | 14 | 43 | 3.07 |
9 | Louisville | 67.67 | 18 | 53 | 2.94 |
10 | Texas Tech | 68.98 | 15 | 41 | 2.73 |
11 | Texas | 85.62 | 3 | 8 | 2.67 |
12 | Wisconsin | 68.33 | 16 | 42 | 2.63 |
13 | Virginia Tech | 74.49 | 10 | 26 | 2.60 |
14 | Ohio State | 85.16 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 |
15 | Northern Illinois | 57.14 | 46 | 109 | 2.37 |
16 | Iowa | 66.94 | 19 | 44 | 2.32 |
17 | Fresno State | 60.22 | 34 | 77 | 2.26 |
18 | South Florida | 61.69 | 28 | 63 | 2.25 |
19 | Air Force | 52.26 | 59 | 116 | 1.97 |
20 | Brigham Young | 59.52 | 36 | 66 | 1.83 |
21 | Oregon State | 62.39 | 27 | 49 | 1.81 |
22 | Connecticut | 57.32 | 45 | 81 | 1.80 |
23 | Toledo | 54.79 | 50 | 90 | 1.80 |
24 | Florida Atlantic | 49.57 | 66 | 118 | 1.79 |
25 | Cincinnati | 57.63 | 42 | 74 | 1.76 |
26 | Nevada | 52.84 | 56 | 94 | 1.68 |
27 | New Mexico | 53.31 | 55 | 89 | 1.62 |
28 | Central Michigan | 48.48 | 69 | 110 | 1.59 |
29 | Miami (OH) | 50.84 | 64 | 100 | 1.56 |
30 | Tulsa | 54.85 | 49 | 72 | 1.47 |
31 | Southern Miss | 58.82 | 39 | 57 | 1.46 |
32 | Ball State | 45.59 | 78 | 107 | 1.37 |
33 | Georgia Tech | 58.82 | 38 | 52 | 1.37 |
34 | Wake Forest | 53.94 | 52 | 68 | 1.31 |
35 | Houston | 52.47 | 58 | 75 | 1.29 |
36 | Troy | 52.54 | 57 | 73 | 1.28 |
37 | UTEP | 40.29 | 86 | 110 | 1.28 |
38 | Penn State | 63.62 | 24 | 30 | 1.25 |
39 | Colorado State | 46.26 | 75 | 93 | 1.24 |
40 | La-Monroe | 34.42 | 98 | 113 | 1.15 |
41 | Louisiana Tech | 44.99 | 80 | 92 | 1.15 |
42 | San Jose State | 39.97 | 87 | 100 | 1.15 |
43 | Ohio | 38.62 | 89 | 102 | 1.15 |
44 | Western Mich | 45.74 | 77 | 87 | 1.13 |
45 | Marshall | 48.24 | 71 | 80 | 1.13 |
46 | La-Lafayette | 39.18 | 88 | 98 | 1.11 |
47 | Rice | 38.59 | 90 | 99 | 1.10 |
48 | New Mexico St | 31.13 | 105 | 115 | 1.10 |
49 | North Texas | 36.75 | 95 | 104 | 1.09 |
50 | Missouri | 60.81 | 32 | 34 | 1.06 |
51 | Arkansas State | 43.82 | 82 | 86 | 1.05 |
52 | California | 66.50 | 21 | 22 | 1.05 |
53 | Wyoming | 38.53 | 91 | 95 | 1.04 |
54 | Akron | 45.25 | 79 | 82 | 1.04 |
55 | East Carolina | 40.71 | 84 | 87 | 1.04 |
56 | Florida Intl | 26.80 | 112 | 114 | 1.02 |
57 | Mid Tenn State | 40.81 | 83 | 84 | 1.01 |
58 | Tulane | 35.74 | 97 | 97 | 1.00 |
59 | USC | 90.11 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
60 | Army | 19.70 | 118 | 117 | 0.99 |
61 | Memphis | 47.99 | 72 | 71 | 0.99 |
62 | Buffalo | 22.77 | 115 | 112 | 0.97 |
63 | Clemson | 61.27 | 29 | 28 | 0.97 |
64 | Kent | 32.79 | 100 | 96 | 0.96 |
65 | Purdue | 54.13 | 51 | 48 | 0.94 |
66 | Idaho | 20.45 | 116 | 108 | 0.93 |
67 | Eastern Michigan | 27.06 | 111 | 103 | 0.93 |
68 | Utah State | 23.70 | 113 | 104 | 0.92 |
69 | Oregon | 63.45 | 25 | 23 | 0.92 |
70 | Pitt | 57.68 | 41 | 36 | 0.88 |
71 | Washington St | 48.96 | 68 | 58 | 0.85 |
72 | Minnesota | 51.92 | 60 | 51 | 0.85 |
73 | Northwestern | 47.44 | 73 | 62 | 0.85 |
74 | Kansas State | 53.85 | 53 | 45 | 0.85 |
75 | UAB | 37.45 | 92 | 78 | 0.85 |
76 | Auburn | 71.61 | 13 | 11 | 0.85 |
77 | Oklahoma | 81.89 | 5 | 4 | 0.80 |
78 | Temple | 20.45 | 116 | 90 | 0.78 |
79 | Rutgers | 50.34 | 65 | 50 | 0.77 |
80 | Kansas | 51.62 | 62 | 47 | 0.76 |
81 | Maryland | 60.48 | 33 | 25 | 0.76 |
82 | SMU | 23.48 | 114 | 83 | 0.73 |
83 | UNLV | 29.00 | 110 | 79 | 0.72 |
84 | Central Florida | 40.42 | 85 | 60 | 0.71 |
85 | Vanderbilt | 32.26 | 101 | 70 | 0.69 |
86 | Indiana | 32.26 | 101 | 69 | 0.68 |
87 | Kentucky | 44.86 | 81 | 55 | 0.68 |
88 | San Diego State | 33.40 | 99 | 67 | 0.68 |
89 | Virginia | 57.63 | 43 | 29 | 0.67 |
90 | Oklahoma State | 57.48 | 44 | 27 | 0.61 |
91 | Iowa State | 36.90 | 93 | 54 | 0.58 |
92 | Arizona State | 57.80 | 40 | 23 | 0.58 |
93 | LSU | 77.98 | 7 | 4 | 0.57 |
94 | NC State | 50.96 | 63 | 36 | 0.57 |
95 | Baylor | 30.63 | 108 | 61 | 0.56 |
96 | Duke | 16.99 | 119 | 65 | 0.55 |
97 | Michigan State | 48.34 | 70 | 38 | 0.54 |
98 | Syracuse | 31.06 | 106 | 56 | 0.53 |
99 | Nebraska | 59.18 | 37 | 18 | 0.49 |
100 | Tennessee | 63.31 | 26 | 12 | 0.46 |
101 | Them | 66.58 | 20 | 9 | 0.45 |
102 | Stanford | 31.39 | 104 | 46 | 0.44 |
103 | Alabama | 60.96 | 31 | 13 | 0.42 |
104 | Colorado | 46.55 | 74 | 31 | 0.42 |
105 | Miami (FL) | 68.04 | 17 | 7 | 0.41 |
106 | Arkansas | 55.71 | 48 | 19 | 0.40 |
107 | Washington | 29.08 | 109 | 39 | 0.36 |
108 | Arizona | 36.82 | 94 | 32 | 0.34 |
109 | Illinois | 31.86 | 103 | 35 | 0.34 |
110 | Georgia | 80.35 | 6 | 2 | 0.33 |
111 | Notre Dame | 57.05 | 47 | 15 | 0.32 |
112 | UCLA | 53.48 | 54 | 17 | 0.31 |
113 | Mississippi State | 30.87 | 107 | 33 | 0.31 |
114 | Mississippi | 46.00 | 76 | 20 | 0.26 |
115 | Florida State | 64.95 | 23 | 6 | 0.26 |
116 | Florida | 73.05 | 12 | 3 | 0.25 |
117 | Texas A&M | 49.08 | 67 | 16 | 0.24 |
118 | South Carolina | 51.66 | 61 | 14 | 0.23 |
119 | North Carolina | 36.71 | 96 | 21 | 0.22 |
What exactly can we glean from these numbers?
USC and Tulane pretty much perform as expected for their recruiting classes. For Tulane, that's not necessarily a plus. About half the teams perform better, and half perform worse.
Someone criticized the data by concluding that since Georgia and Florida were so low on the list, the data was useless. Au contraire. Keep in mind that both those schools have consistently recruited well, according to Rivals. It is impossible for USC to out-perform it's recruiting class, and for each team ranked high, it becomes very difficult to live up to expectations. What these numbers suggest is that Florida and Georgia are not performing as well as they are recruiting. In the case of Florida, it is not a matter of wins and losses or National Championships--the data indicate that they should be winning, and perhaps winning more than they are.
It also sugests that schools like Boise State, Utah and TCU are doing more with their talent than other schools, in terms of producing wins. Schools like Florida State are under-performing.
As I expected, PSU did not perform overly well--38th overall and fourth in the Big Ten. Here's how the conference fared:
Big TEN | PCT | PCT Rank | Rivals | Index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 | Wisconsin | 68.33 | 16 | 42 | 2.63 |
14 | Ohio State | 85.16 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 |
16 | Iowa | 66.94 | 19 | 44 | 2.32 |
38 | Penn State | 63.62 | 24 | 30 | 1.25 |
65 | Purdue | 54.13 | 51 | 48 | 0.94 |
72 | Minnesota | 51.92 | 60 | 51 | 0.85 |
73 | Northwestern | 47.44 | 73 | 62 | 0.85 |
86 | Indiana | 32.26 | 101 | 69 | 0.68 |
97 | Michigan State | 48.34 | 70 | 38 | 0.54 |
101 | Them | 66.58 | 20 | 9 | 0.45 |
109 | Illinois | 31.86 | 103 | 35 | 0.34 |
Another way to look at these numbers would be to examine just the numerical difference between a schools Rivals Rank versus its win-loss pct. rank (subtraction versus division.) In this case, teams with highly ranked recruiting classes aren't penalized as much for not producing winning seasons. Here's what that table looks like:
Team | Win-Loss % | PCT Rank | Rivals Rank | Rank Index | Difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Navy | 60.07 | 35 | 119 | 3.40 | 84 |
2 | Bowling Green | 61.14 | 30 | 106 | 3.53 | 76 |
3 | Boise State | 87.90 | 2 | 76 | 38.00 | 74 |
4 | Hawaii | 65.69 | 22 | 85 | 3.86 | 63 |
5 | Northern Illinois | 57.14 | 46 | 109 | 2.37 | 63 |
6 | Air Force | 52.26 | 59 | 116 | 1.97 | 57 |
7 | TCU | 76.55 | 8 | 64 | 8.00 | 56 |
8 | Florida Atlantic | 49.57 | 66 | 118 | 1.79 | 52 |
9 | Utah | 73.98 | 11 | 59 | 5.36 | 48 |
10 | Fresno State | 60.22 | 34 | 77 | 2.26 | 43 |
11 | Central Michigan | 48.48 | 69 | 110 | 1.59 | 41 |
12 | Toledo | 54.79 | 50 | 90 | 1.80 | 40 |
13 | Nevada | 52.84 | 56 | 94 | 1.68 | 38 |
14 | Connecticut | 57.32 | 45 | 81 | 1.80 | 36 |
15 | Miami (OH) | 50.84 | 64 | 100 | 1.56 | 36 |
16 | Louisville | 67.67 | 18 | 53 | 2.94 | 35 |
17 | South Florida | 61.69 | 28 | 63 | 2.25 | 35 |
18 | New Mexico | 53.31 | 55 | 89 | 1.62 | 34 |
19 | Cincinnati | 57.63 | 42 | 74 | 1.76 | 32 |
20 | West Virginia | 75.37 | 9 | 40 | 4.44 | 31 |
21 | Brigham Young | 59.52 | 36 | 66 | 1.83 | 30 |
22 | Ball State | 45.59 | 78 | 107 | 1.37 | 29 |
23 | Boston College | 71.51 | 14 | 43 | 3.07 | 29 |
24 | Texas Tech | 68.98 | 15 | 41 | 2.73 | 26 |
25 | Wisconsin | 68.33 | 16 | 42 | 2.63 | 26 |
26 | Iowa | 66.94 | 19 | 44 | 2.32 | 25 |
27 | UTEP | 40.29 | 86 | 110 | 1.28 | 24 |
28 | Tulsa | 54.85 | 49 | 72 | 1.47 | 23 |
29 | Oregon State | 62.39 | 27 | 49 | 1.81 | 22 |
30 | Colorado State | 46.26 | 75 | 93 | 1.24 | 18 |
31 | Southern Miss | 58.82 | 39 | 57 | 1.46 | 18 |
32 | Houston | 52.47 | 58 | 75 | 1.29 | 17 |
33 | Troy | 52.54 | 57 | 73 | 1.28 | 16 |
34 | Virginia Tech | 74.49 | 10 | 26 | 2.60 | 16 |
35 | Wake Forest | 53.94 | 52 | 68 | 1.31 | 16 |
36 | La-Monroe | 34.42 | 98 | 113 | 1.15 | 15 |
37 | Georgia Tech | 58.82 | 38 | 52 | 1.37 | 14 |
38 | Ohio | 38.62 | 89 | 102 | 1.15 | 13 |
39 | San Jose State | 39.97 | 87 | 100 | 1.15 | 13 |
40 | Louisiana Tech | 44.99 | 80 | 92 | 1.15 | 12 |
41 | La-Lafayette | 39.18 | 88 | 98 | 1.11 | 10 |
42 | New Mexico St | 31.13 | 105 | 115 | 1.10 | 10 |
43 | Western Mich | 45.74 | 77 | 87 | 1.13 | 10 |
44 | Marshall | 48.24 | 71 | 80 | 1.13 | 9 |
45 | North Texas | 36.75 | 95 | 104 | 1.09 | 9 |
46 | Rice | 38.59 | 90 | 99 | 1.10 | 9 |
47 | Ohio State | 85.16 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 6 |
48 | Penn State | 63.62 | 24 | 30 | 1.25 | 6 |
49 | Texas | 85.62 | 3 | 8 | 2.67 | 5 |
50 | Arkansas State | 43.82 | 82 | 86 | 1.05 | 4 |
51 | Wyoming | 38.53 | 91 | 95 | 1.04 | 4 |
52 | Akron | 45.25 | 79 | 82 | 1.04 | 3 |
53 | East Carolina | 40.71 | 84 | 87 | 1.04 | 3 |
54 | Florida Intl | 26.80 | 112 | 114 | 1.02 | 2 |
55 | Missouri | 60.81 | 32 | 34 | 1.06 | 2 |
56 | California | 66.50 | 21 | 22 | 1.05 | 1 |
57 | Mid Tenn State | 40.81 | 83 | 84 | 1.01 | 1 |
58 | Tulane | 35.74 | 97 | 97 | 1.00 | 0 |
59 | USC | 90.11 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 0 |
60 | Army | 19.70 | 118 | 117 | 0.99 | -1 |
61 | Clemson | 61.27 | 29 | 28 | 0.97 | -1 |
62 | Memphis | 47.99 | 72 | 71 | 0.99 | -1 |
63 | Oklahoma | 81.89 | 5 | 4 | 0.80 | -1 |
64 | Auburn | 71.61 | 13 | 11 | 0.85 | -2 |
65 | Oregon | 63.45 | 25 | 23 | 0.92 | -2 |
66 | Buffalo | 22.77 | 115 | 112 | 0.97 | -3 |
67 | LSU | 77.98 | 7 | 4 | 0.57 | -3 |
68 | Purdue | 54.13 | 51 | 48 | 0.94 | -3 |
69 | Georgia | 80.35 | 6 | 2 | 0.33 | -4 |
70 | Kent | 32.79 | 100 | 96 | 0.96 | -4 |
71 | Pitt | 57.68 | 41 | 36 | 0.88 | -5 |
72 | Eastern Michigan | 27.06 | 111 | 103 | 0.93 | -8 |
73 | Idaho | 20.45 | 116 | 108 | 0.93 | -8 |
74 | Kansas State | 53.85 | 53 | 45 | 0.85 | -8 |
75 | Maryland | 60.48 | 33 | 25 | 0.76 | -8 |
76 | Florida | 73.05 | 12 | 3 | 0.25 | -9 |
77 | Minnesota | 51.92 | 60 | 51 | 0.85 | -9 |
78 | Utah State | 23.70 | 113 | 104 | 0.92 | -9 |
79 | Miami (FL) | 68.04 | 17 | 7 | 0.41 | -10 |
80 | Washington St | 48.96 | 68 | 58 | 0.85 | -10 |
81 | Northwestern | 47.44 | 73 | 62 | 0.85 | -11 |
82 | Them | 66.58 | 20 | 9 | 0.45 | -11 |
83 | Tennessee | 63.31 | 26 | 12 | 0.46 | -14 |
84 | UAB | 37.45 | 92 | 78 | 0.85 | -14 |
85 | Virginia | 57.63 | 43 | 29 | 0.67 | -14 |
86 | Kansas | 51.62 | 62 | 47 | 0.76 | -15 |
87 | Rutgers | 50.34 | 65 | 50 | 0.77 | -15 |
88 | Arizona State | 57.80 | 40 | 23 | 0.58 | -17 |
89 | Florida State | 64.95 | 23 | 6 | 0.26 | -17 |
90 | Oklahoma State | 57.48 | 44 | 27 | 0.61 | -17 |
91 | Alabama | 60.96 | 31 | 13 | 0.42 | -18 |
92 | Nebraska | 59.18 | 37 | 18 | 0.49 | -19 |
93 | Central Florida | 40.42 | 85 | 60 | 0.71 | -25 |
94 | Kentucky | 44.86 | 81 | 55 | 0.68 | -26 |
95 | Temple | 20.45 | 116 | 90 | 0.78 | -26 |
96 | NC State | 50.96 | 63 | 36 | 0.57 | -27 |
97 | Arkansas | 55.71 | 48 | 19 | 0.40 | -29 |
98 | SMU | 23.48 | 114 | 83 | 0.73 | -31 |
99 | UNLV | 29.00 | 110 | 79 | 0.72 | -31 |
100 | Vanderbilt | 32.26 | 101 | 70 | 0.69 | -31 |
101 | Indiana | 32.26 | 101 | 69 | 0.68 | -32 |
102 | Michigan State | 48.34 | 70 | 38 | 0.54 | -32 |
103 | Notre Dame | 57.05 | 47 | 15 | 0.32 | -32 |
104 | San Diego State | 33.40 | 99 | 67 | 0.68 | -32 |
105 | UCLA | 53.48 | 54 | 17 | 0.31 | -37 |
106 | Iowa State | 36.90 | 93 | 54 | 0.58 | -39 |
107 | Colorado | 46.55 | 74 | 31 | 0.42 | -43 |
108 | Baylor | 30.63 | 108 | 61 | 0.56 | -47 |
109 | South Carolina | 51.66 | 61 | 14 | 0.23 | -47 |
110 | Syracuse | 31.06 | 106 | 56 | 0.53 | -50 |
111 | Texas A&M | 49.08 | 67 | 16 | 0.24 | -51 |
112 | Duke | 16.99 | 119 | 65 | 0.55 | -54 |
113 | Mississippi | 46.00 | 76 | 20 | 0.26 | -56 |
114 | Stanford | 31.39 | 104 | 46 | 0.44 | -58 |
115 | Arizona | 36.82 | 94 | 32 | 0.34 | -62 |
116 | Illinois | 31.86 | 103 | 35 | 0.34 | -68 |
117 | Washington | 29.08 | 109 | 39 | 0.36 | -70 |
118 | Mississippi State | 30.87 | 107 | 33 | 0.31 | -74 |
119 | North Carolina | 36.71 | 96 | 21 | 0.22 | -75 |
USC and Tulane are 0. Schools like Florida and Georgia move up. North Carolina still pretty much sucks. The Big Ten looks like this:
Team | Win-Loss % | PCT Rank | Rivals Rank | Rank Index | Difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 | Wisconsin | 68.33 | 16 | 42 | 2.63 | 26 |
26 | Iowa | 66.94 | 19 | 44 | 2.32 | 25 |
47 | Ohio State | 85.16 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 6 |
48 | Penn State | 63.62 | 24 | 30 | 1.25 | 6 |
68 | Purdue | 54.13 | 51 | 48 | 0.94 | -3 |
77 | Minnesota | 51.92 | 60 | 51 | 0.85 | -9 |
81 | Northwestern | 47.44 | 73 | 62 | 0.85 | -11 |
82 | Them | 66.58 | 20 | 9 | 0.45 | -11 |
101 | Indiana | 32.26 | 101 | 69 | 0.68 | -32 |
102 | Michigan State | 48.34 | 70 | 38 | 0.54 | -32 |
116 | Illinois | 31.86 | 103 | 35 | 0.34 | -68 |
Eventually, I hope to re-analyze these data in terms of how a given recruiting class reflects a team's rank 2,3, or 4 years down the road.
1 comment:
Great post and research. We've always known that Rivals add or subtract a star based solely on the scholarships offered. Highly subjective.
Post a Comment