Thursday, June 11, 2009

Recruiting Success

Ever wonder just how worthwhile (or worthless) recruiting data are? Does having the #1 ranked recruiting class really predict how well a team will do?

To explore this fascinating issue (fascinating by virtue of the fact that no actual football is being played right now,) I looked at how the Rivals ranking of recruiting classes compared over a period of time (2002-2008.) Why did I choose that time span? Because that was the time span I could easily access the data for Rivals, which ranked all 119 Division 1A schools.

I then took each team's win loss record as a percentage, and ranked that.

Then I did a simple calculation, comparing the Rivals Rank to that of the Win Percentage Rank, by dividing the former by the latter. I originally dubbed this a rank ratio, but someone with higher math skills than mine suggested that a ratio is like 1:2 and that this is an "index." So be it. The Rank Index was born. A team that is ranked close to or at it's recruiting rank would have an index of 1 or close to it. The higher the number, the better a team/coach out performs it's recruiting rank. The lower the number, the more talent is being squandered, and/or the more a team's recruiting rank was over-rated.

Here are the results:


TeamWin-Loss %PCT RankRivals RankRank Index
1Boise State87.9027638.00
2TCU76.558648.00
3Utah73.9811595.36
4West Virginia75.379404.44
5Hawaii65.6922853.86
6Bowling Green61.14301063.53
7Navy60.07351193.40
8Boston College71.5114433.07
9Louisville67.6718532.94
10Texas Tech68.9815412.73
11Texas85.62382.67
12Wisconsin68.3316422.63
13Virginia Tech74.4910262.60
14Ohio State85.164102.50
15Northern Illinois57.14461092.37
16Iowa66.9419442.32
17Fresno State60.2234772.26
18South Florida61.6928632.25
19Air Force52.26591161.97
20Brigham Young59.5236661.83
21Oregon State62.3927491.81
22Connecticut57.3245811.80
23Toledo54.7950901.80
24Florida Atlantic49.57661181.79
25Cincinnati57.6342741.76
26Nevada52.8456941.68
27New Mexico53.3155891.62
28Central Michigan48.48691101.59
29Miami (OH)50.84641001.56
30Tulsa54.8549721.47
31Southern Miss58.8239571.46
32Ball State45.59781071.37
33Georgia Tech58.8238521.37
34Wake Forest53.9452681.31
35Houston52.4758751.29
36Troy52.5457731.28
37UTEP40.29861101.28
38Penn State63.6224301.25
39Colorado State46.2675931.24
40La-Monroe34.42981131.15
41Louisiana Tech44.9980921.15
42San Jose State39.97871001.15
43Ohio38.62891021.15
44Western Mich45.7477871.13
45Marshall48.2471801.13
46La-Lafayette39.1888981.11
47Rice38.5990991.10
48New Mexico St31.131051151.10
49North Texas36.75951041.09
50Missouri60.8132341.06
51Arkansas State43.8282861.05
52California66.5021221.05
53Wyoming38.5391951.04
54Akron45.2579821.04
55East Carolina40.7184871.04
56Florida Intl26.801121141.02
57Mid Tenn State40.8183841.01
58Tulane35.7497971.00
59USC90.11111.00
60Army19.701181170.99
61Memphis47.9972710.99
62Buffalo22.771151120.97
63Clemson61.2729280.97
64Kent32.79100960.96
65Purdue54.1351480.94
66Idaho20.451161080.93
67Eastern Michigan27.061111030.93
68Utah State23.701131040.92
69Oregon63.4525230.92
70Pitt57.6841360.88
71Washington St48.9668580.85
72Minnesota51.9260510.85
73Northwestern47.4473620.85
74Kansas State53.8553450.85
75UAB37.4592780.85
76Auburn71.6113110.85
77Oklahoma81.89540.80
78Temple20.45116900.78
79Rutgers50.3465500.77
80Kansas51.6262470.76
81Maryland60.4833250.76
82SMU23.48114830.73
83UNLV29.00110790.72
84Central Florida40.4285600.71
85Vanderbilt32.26101700.69
86Indiana32.26101690.68
87Kentucky44.8681550.68
88San Diego State33.4099670.68
89Virginia57.6343290.67
90Oklahoma State57.4844270.61
91Iowa State36.9093540.58
92Arizona State57.8040230.58
93LSU77.98740.57
94NC State50.9663360.57
95Baylor30.63108610.56
96Duke16.99119650.55
97Michigan State48.3470380.54
98Syracuse31.06106560.53
99Nebraska59.1837180.49
100Tennessee63.3126120.46
101Them66.582090.45
102Stanford31.39104460.44
103Alabama60.9631130.42
104Colorado46.5574310.42
105Miami (FL)68.041770.41
106Arkansas55.7148190.40
107Washington29.08109390.36
108Arizona36.8294320.34
109Illinois31.86103350.34
110Georgia80.35620.33
111Notre Dame57.0547150.32
112UCLA53.4854170.31
113Mississippi State30.87107330.31
114Mississippi46.0076200.26
115Florida State64.952360.26
116Florida73.051230.25
117Texas A&M49.0867160.24
118South Carolina51.6661140.23
119North Carolina36.7196210.22

What exactly can we glean from these numbers?

USC and Tulane pretty much perform as expected for their recruiting classes. For Tulane, that's not necessarily a plus. About half the teams perform better, and half perform worse.

Someone criticized the data by concluding that since Georgia and Florida were so low on the list, the data was useless. Au contraire. Keep in mind that both those schools have consistently recruited well, according to Rivals. It is impossible for USC to out-perform it's recruiting class, and for each team ranked high, it becomes very difficult to live up to expectations. What these numbers suggest is that Florida and Georgia are not performing as well as they are recruiting. In the case of Florida, it is not a matter of wins and losses or National Championships--the data indicate that they should be winning, and perhaps winning more than they are.

It also sugests that schools like Boise State, Utah and TCU are doing more with their talent than other schools, in terms of producing wins. Schools like Florida State are under-performing.

As I expected, PSU did not perform overly well--38th overall and fourth in the Big Ten. Here's how the conference fared:


Big TENPCTPCT RankRivalsIndex
12Wisconsin68.3316422.63
14Ohio State85.164102.50
16Iowa66.9419442.32
38Penn State63.6224301.25
65Purdue54.1351480.94
72Minnesota51.9260510.85
73Northwestern47.4473620.85
86Indiana32.26101690.68
97Michigan State48.3470380.54
101Them66.582090.45
109Illinois31.86103350.34


Another way to look at these numbers would be to examine just the numerical difference between a schools Rivals Rank versus its win-loss pct. rank (subtraction versus division.) In this case, teams with highly ranked recruiting classes aren't penalized as much for not producing winning seasons. Here's what that table looks like:


TeamWin-Loss %PCT RankRivals RankRank IndexDifference
1Navy60.07351193.4084
2Bowling Green61.14301063.5376
3Boise State87.9027638.0074
4Hawaii65.6922853.8663
5Northern Illinois57.14461092.3763
6Air Force52.26591161.9757
7TCU76.558648.0056
8Florida Atlantic49.57661181.7952
9Utah73.9811595.3648
10Fresno State60.2234772.2643
11Central Michigan48.48691101.5941
12Toledo54.7950901.8040
13Nevada52.8456941.6838
14Connecticut57.3245811.8036
15Miami (OH)50.84641001.5636
16Louisville67.6718532.9435
17South Florida61.6928632.2535
18New Mexico53.3155891.6234
19Cincinnati57.6342741.7632
20West Virginia75.379404.4431
21Brigham Young59.5236661.8330
22Ball State45.59781071.3729
23Boston College71.5114433.0729
24Texas Tech68.9815412.7326
25Wisconsin68.3316422.6326
26Iowa66.9419442.3225
27UTEP40.29861101.2824
28Tulsa54.8549721.4723
29Oregon State62.3927491.8122
30Colorado State46.2675931.2418
31Southern Miss58.8239571.4618
32Houston52.4758751.2917
33Troy52.5457731.2816
34Virginia Tech74.4910262.6016
35Wake Forest53.9452681.3116
36La-Monroe34.42981131.1515
37Georgia Tech58.8238521.3714
38Ohio38.62891021.1513
39San Jose State39.97871001.1513
40Louisiana Tech44.9980921.1512
41La-Lafayette39.1888981.1110
42New Mexico St31.131051151.1010
43Western Mich45.7477871.1310
44Marshall48.2471801.139
45North Texas36.75951041.099
46Rice38.5990991.109
47Ohio State85.164102.506
48Penn State63.6224301.256
49Texas85.62382.675
50Arkansas State43.8282861.054
51Wyoming38.5391951.044
52Akron45.2579821.043
53East Carolina40.7184871.043
54Florida Intl26.801121141.022
55Missouri60.8132341.062
56California66.5021221.051
57Mid Tenn State40.8183841.011
58Tulane35.7497971.000
59USC90.11111.000
60Army19.701181170.99-1
61Clemson61.2729280.97-1
62Memphis47.9972710.99-1
63Oklahoma81.89540.80-1
64Auburn71.6113110.85-2
65Oregon63.4525230.92-2
66Buffalo22.771151120.97-3
67LSU77.98740.57-3
68Purdue54.1351480.94-3
69Georgia80.35620.33-4
70Kent32.79100960.96-4
71Pitt57.6841360.88-5
72Eastern Michigan27.061111030.93-8
73Idaho20.451161080.93-8
74Kansas State53.8553450.85-8
75Maryland60.4833250.76-8
76Florida73.051230.25-9
77Minnesota51.9260510.85-9
78Utah State23.701131040.92-9
79Miami (FL)68.041770.41-10
80Washington St48.9668580.85-10
81Northwestern47.4473620.85-11
82Them66.582090.45-11
83Tennessee63.3126120.46-14
84UAB37.4592780.85-14
85Virginia57.6343290.67-14
86Kansas51.6262470.76-15
87Rutgers50.3465500.77-15
88Arizona State57.8040230.58-17
89Florida State64.952360.26-17
90Oklahoma State57.4844270.61-17
91Alabama60.9631130.42-18
92Nebraska59.1837180.49-19
93Central Florida40.4285600.71-25
94Kentucky44.8681550.68-26
95Temple20.45116900.78-26
96NC State50.9663360.57-27
97Arkansas55.7148190.40-29
98SMU23.48114830.73-31
99UNLV29.00110790.72-31
100Vanderbilt32.26101700.69-31
101Indiana32.26101690.68-32
102Michigan State48.3470380.54-32
103Notre Dame57.0547150.32-32
104San Diego State33.4099670.68-32
105UCLA53.4854170.31-37
106Iowa State36.9093540.58-39
107Colorado46.5574310.42-43
108Baylor30.63108610.56-47
109South Carolina51.6661140.23-47
110Syracuse31.06106560.53-50
111Texas A&M49.0867160.24-51
112Duke16.99119650.55-54
113Mississippi46.0076200.26-56
114Stanford31.39104460.44-58
115Arizona36.8294320.34-62
116Illinois31.86103350.34-68
117Washington29.08109390.36-70
118Mississippi State30.87107330.31-74
119North Carolina36.7196210.22-75


USC and Tulane are 0. Schools like Florida and Georgia move up. North Carolina still pretty much sucks. The Big Ten looks like this:


TeamWin-Loss %PCT RankRivals RankRank IndexDifference
25Wisconsin68.3316422.6326
26Iowa66.9419442.3225
47Ohio State85.164102.506
48Penn State63.6224301.256
68Purdue54.1351480.94-3
77Minnesota51.9260510.85-9
81Northwestern47.4473620.85-11
82Them66.582090.45-11
101Indiana32.26101690.68-32
102Michigan State48.3470380.54-32
116Illinois31.86103350.34-68


Eventually, I hope to re-analyze these data in terms of how a given recruiting class reflects a team's rank 2,3, or 4 years down the road.

1 comment:

Nittany White Out said...

Great post and research. We've always known that Rivals add or subtract a star based solely on the scholarships offered. Highly subjective.