Asleep in Seattle
2 days ago
| NCAA Stats Comparison | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Category: | Penn St. | Illinois | Delta |
| Rushing | 50 | 23 | -27 |
| Passing Offense | 84 | 72 | -12 |
| Total Offense | 76 | 45 | -31 |
| Scoring Offense | 89 | 64 | -25 |
| Rushing Defense | 19 | 19 | 0 |
| Turnovers Gained | 13 | 42 | 29 |
| Passes Had Intercepted | 48 | 48 | 0 |
| Pass Defense | 14 | 21 | 7 |
| Net Punting | 95 | 102 | 7 |
| Punt Returns | 79 | 116 | 37 |
| Kickoff Returns | 20 | 118 | 98 |
| Turnover Margin | 27 | 74 | 47 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 46 | 46 | 0 |
| Passes Intercepted | 6 | 44 | 38 |
| Fumbles Lost | 74 | 102 | 28 |
| Turnovers Lost | 66 | 90 | 24 |
| Passing Efficiency | 98 | 31 | -67 |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 5 | 42 | 37 |
| Total Defense | 8 | 10 | 2 |
| Scoring Defense | 5 | 15 | 10 |
| Fewest Penalties Per Game | 27 | 17 | -10 |
| Fewest Yards Penalized Per Game | 31 | 15 | -16 |
| Punt Return Yardage Defense | 71 | 53 | -18 |
| Kickoff Return Yardage Defense | 73 | 100 | 27 |
| Offense Third-down Efficiency | 73 | 13 | -60 |
| Offense Fourth-down Efficiency | 4 | 118 | 114 |
| Defense Third-down Efficiency | 35 | 18 | -17 |
| Defense Fourth-down Efficiency | 82 | 82 | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 25 | 6 | -19 |
| Offense Tackles for Loss | 5 | 70 | 65 |
| Pass Sacks | 23 | 8 | -15 |
| Pass Sacks Allowed | 14 | 106 | 92 |
| Time of Possession | 33 | 20 | -13 |
| First Downs | 73 | 45 | -28 |
| First Downs Allowed | 13 | 14 | 1 |
| Red Zone Efficiency | 87 | 34 | -53 |
| Red Zone Efficiency - Defense | 117 | 44 | -73 |
| Average NCAA Rank: | 46.16 | 51.00 | 4.84 |
| Weighted Avg. Rank: | 47.50 | 43.17 | -4.33 |
